Solvability of a system of dual integral equations of a mixed boundary value problem for the laplace equation - Nguyen Thi Ngan

TÍNH GIÀI ĐƯỢC CỦA MỘT HỆ PHƯƠNG TRÌNH CẶP TÍCH PHÂN TRONG BÀI TOÁN BIÊN HỗN HỢP CỦA PHƯƠNG TRÌNH LAPLACE Đối VÓI MIEN HÌNH DÀI Tóm tat. Trong bài báo này chúng tòi xét tính giải được của một hệ phương trình cặp tích phán Fourier gặp trong bài toán biên hỏn hợp của phương trình Laplace đối với miền hình dải. Đã chứng minh các định lý tổn tại và duy nhất nghiệm của hệ trong không gian Sobolev của các hàm suy rộng. Trình bày phương pháp đưa hệ phương trình cặp nói trên về hệ phương trình tích phân Fredholm loại hai trong không gian các hàm bình phương khả tích. Từ khoá: Biến đổi Fourier, hệ phương trình cặp tích phán, phương trình Laplace, bài toán biên hỏn hợp.

pdf6 trang | Chia sẻ: thucuc2301 | Lượt xem: 674 | Lượt tải: 0download
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Solvability of a system of dual integral equations of a mixed boundary value problem for the laplace equation - Nguyen Thi Ngan, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
SOLVABILITY OF A SYSTEM OF DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF A MIXED BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM FOR THE LAPLACE EQUATION Nguyen Thi Ngan1 and Nguyen Thi Minh, College of Education -TNU Summary. The aim of the present paper is to consider solvability and solution of a system of dual integral equations involving Fourier transforms occurring in mixed boundary value problems for Laplace equation. The uniqueness and existence theorems are proved. A method for reducing system of dual equations to a system of Fredholm integral equations of second kind is also proposed. Key words: Fourier transform, dual integral equations, Laplace equation, mixed boundary value problems. 1 Introduction Dual integral equations arise when integral trans- forms are used to solve mixed boundary value prob- lems of mathematical physics and mechanics. For- mal technique for solving such equations have been developed extensively, but their solvability prob- lems have been considered comparatively weakly [1, 2]. The solvabilities of dual integral equations involving Fourier transforms and dual series equa- tions involving orthogonal expansions of general- ized functions were considered in [3, 4]. The solvability problems for systems of dual equa- tions so far we know have been not considered. The aim of the present work is to consider existence and uniqueness problems for a system of dual integral equations involving Fourier transforms occurring in one mixed boundary value problem for the Laplace equation. A method for reducing system of dual equations to a system of Fredholm integral equa- tions of second kind is also proposed. Consider the following problem: find a solution of the Laplace equation ∂2Φ ∂x2 + ∂2Φ ∂y2 = 0, (−∞ < x <∞, 0 < y < h) (1.1) subject to the boundary conditions−Φ(x, 0) = f1(x), x ∈ (a, b),∂Φ ∂y (x, 0) = 0, x ∈ R \ (a, b), (1.2) ∂Φ ∂y (x, h) = f2(x), x ∈ (a, b), Φ(x, h) = 0, x ∈ R \ (a, b), (1.3) where f1, f2 are given functions. We will solve the problem (1.1)-(1.3) by the method of Fourier transformation. For a suitable func- tion f(x), x ∈ R = (−∞,∞)(for example, f(x) ∈ L1(R)), direct and inverse Fourier transforms are defined by the formulas fˆ(ξ) = F [f ](ξ) = ∫ ∞ −∞ f(x)eixξdx, (1.4) f˘(ξ) = F−1[f ](ξ) = 1 2pi ∫ ∞ −∞ f(x)e−ixξdx. (1.5) The Fourier transforms of tempered generalized functions can be found, for example, in [5,6]. The formulated problem (1.1)-(1.3) is reduced to the following system of dual integral equations F−1 [ sinh(ξh) ξ cosh(ξh) uˆ1(ξ)− uˆ2(ξ) cosh(ξh) ] (x) = f1(x), x ∈ (a, b), F−1 [ uˆ1(ξ) cosh(ξh) + ξ sinh(ξh) cosh(ξh) uˆ2(ξ) ] (x) = f2(x), x ∈ (a, b), u1(x) = 0, x ∈ R \ (a, b), u2(x) = 0, x ∈ R \ (a, b), (1.6) where u1(x) = F −1[uˆ1(ξ)](x) = ∂Φ(x, 0) ∂y , u2(x) = F −1[uˆ2(ξ)](x) = Φ(x, h). 2 Solvability of the system of dual equations Let R be a real axis, S = S(R) and S ′ = S ′(R) be the Schwartz spaces of basic and generalized func- tions, respectively [5, 6]. Denote by F and F−1 the Fourier transform and inverse Fourier transform de- fined on S ′. It is known that these operators are au- tomorphisms on S and S ′. For a suitable ordinary function f(x) (for example, f ∈ L1(R)), the direct 1Tel: 0979791223 Số hóa bởi Trung tâm Học liệu – Đại học Thái Nguyên and inverse Fourier transforms are defined by for- mulas in (1.4) and (1.5), respectively. The symbol denotes a value of the generalized func- tion f ∈ S ′ on the basic function ϕ ∈ S, besides, (f, ϕ) := . Let Hs := Hs(R)(s ∈ R) be the Sobolev space de- fined as a closure of the set C∞o (R) of infinitely dif- ferentiable functions with a compact support with respect to the norm [6] ||u||s := [ ∫ ∞ −∞ (1 + |ξ|)2s|uˆ(ξ)|2dξ ]1/2 <∞. (2.1) The space Hs is Hilbert with the following scalar product (u, v)s := ∫ ∞ −∞ (1 + |ξ|)2sû(ξ)v̂(ξ)dξ. (2.2) Let Ω = (a, b) be a certain interval in R. The sub- space of Hs(R) consisting of functions u(x) with suppu ⊂ Ω is denoted by Hso(Ω)[6], while the space of functions v(x) = pu(x), where u ∈ Hs(R) and p is the restriction operator to Ω is denoted byHs(Ω). The norm in Hs(Ω) is defined by ||v||Hs(Ω) = inf l ||lv||s, where the infimum is taken over all possible exten- sions lv ∈ Hs(R). Let X be a linear topological space. We denote the direct product of two elements X by X2. A topol- ogy in X2 is given by the usual topology of the di- rect product. We shall use bold letters for denoting vector-values and matrices Denote by u a vector of the form (u1, u2), and S2 = S×S, (S′)2 = S ′×S ′. For the vectors u ∈ (S ′)2, ϕ ∈ S2 and put = 2∑ j=1 . The Fouruier transform and inverse Fourier trans- form of a vector u ∈ (S′)2 are the vectors uˆ = F±1[u] = (F±1[u1], F±1[u2]), defined by the equa- tions [5]: = . (2.3) Let Hsj , H sj o (Ω), Hsj (Ω) be the Sobolev spaces, where j = 1, 2; Ω is a certain set of intervals in R. We put ~s = (s1, s2), H~s = Hs1 ×Hs2 , H~so(Ω) = Hs1o (Ω)×Hs2o (Ω), H~s(Ω) = Hs1(Ω)×Hs2(Ω). A scalar product and a norm in H~s and H~so(Ω) are given by the formulas (u,v)~s = 2∑ j=1 (uj , vj)sj , ||u||~s = ( 2∑ j=1 ||uj ||2sj )1/2 , where ||uj ||sj and (uj , vj)sj are given by the for- mula (2.1) and (2.2), respectively. A norm in H~s(Ω) is defined by the equation ||u||H~s(Ω) := ( 2∑ j=1 inf lj ||ljuj ||2sj )1/2 , where lj - extension operator of the uj ∈ Hsj (Ω) from Ω to R. Theorem 2.1. Let Ω ⊂ R,u = (u1, u2) ∈ H~s(Ω), f ∈ H−~s(Ω) and lf = (l1f1, l2f2) be an extension of f from Ω to R belonging H−~s(R), then the integrals [f ,u] := 2∑ j=1 ∫ ∞ −∞ l̂jfj(t)ûj(t)dt (2.4) do not depend on the choice of the extension lf . Therefore, this formula defines a linear continuous functional on H~so(Ω). Conversely, for every linear continuous functional Φ(u) on H~so(Ω) there exists an element f ∈ H−~s(Ω) such that Φ(u) = [u, f ] and ||Φ|| = ||f ||H−~s(Ω). Proof. The proof is based on the fact, that the set (C∞o (Ω)) 2 is dense in H~so(Ω), ~s = (s1, s2), and on the Riesz theorem. Consider the Fourier integral operators of the form (Au)(x) := F−1[A(t)û(t)](x), where A(t) = ||aij(t)||2×2 is a square matrix of order two , u = (u1, u2) T is a vector, transposed to the line vector (u1, u2), and û(t) := F [u] = (F [u1], F [u2]) T . We introduce following classes. Definition 2.1. Let α ∈ R. We say that the func- tion a(t) belongs to the class σα(R), if |a(t)| 6 C1(1 + |t|)α, ∀t ∈ R, and belongs to the class σα+(R), if C2(1 + |t|)α 6 a(t) 6 C1(1 + |t|)α, ∀t ∈ R, where C1 and C2 are certain posi- tive constants. Lemma 2.2. [4]. Let a(t) > 0 and such that (1 + |t|)−αa(t) is a bounded continuous function on R. Suppose moreover that, there are the positive limits of the function (1+ |t|)−αa(t) when t→ ±∞. Then a(t) ∈ σα+(R). Số hóa bởi Trung tâm Học liệu – Đại học Thái Nguyên Definition 2.2. Let A(t) = ||aij(t)||2×2, t ∈ R be a square matrix of second order, where aij(t) are continuous functions on R, αi ∈ R, (i = 1, 2), ~α = (α1, α2). Denote by Σ ~α(R) the class of square ma- trices A(t) = ||aij(t)||2×2, such that aii(t) ∈ σαi(R), aij(t) ∈ σβij (R), βij 6 1 2 (αi + αj). We shall say that the matrix A(t) belongs to the class Σ~α+(R), if wTAw ≥ C1 2∑ j=1 (1 + |t|)αj |wj |2, ∀w = (w1, w2)T , where C1 is a positive constant. Finally, the matrix A(t) belongs to class Σ~αo (R), if A(t) ∈ Σ~α and Re wTAw ≥ 0, ∀w = (w1, w2)T . Lemma 2.3. Let the matrix A(t) = A+(t) belongs to the class Σ~α+(R). Then scalar product and norm in H~α/2(R) can be defined by the formulas (u,v)A+,~α/2 = ∫ ∞ −∞ F [vT ](t)A+(t)F [u](t)dt, (2.5) ||u||A+,~α/2 = (∫ ∞ −∞ F [uT ](t)A+(t)F [u](t)dt )1/2 , (2.6) respectively. Lemma 2.4. Let A(t) ∈ Σα(R). Then the Fourier integral operator Au defined by the formula F−1[A(t)uˆ(t)](x) is bounded from H~α/2(R) into H−~α/2(R). Lemma 2.5. Let Ω be a bounded subset of intervals in R. Then immersion of H~s(Ω) into H~s−~ε(Ω) is a completely continuous, where ~ε = (ε1, ε2) > 0 ⇔ εj > 0, j = 1, 2. Proof. The proof is based on the fact that the im- mersion Hsj (Ω) into Hsj−εj (Ω), εj > 0 is com- pletely continuous if Ω is bounded in R (see, [3, 6]). The system (1.6) can be rewritten in the form{ pF−1[A(ξ)û(ξ)](x) = f(x), x ∈ Ω := (a, b), p′F−1[û(ξ)](x) = 0, x ∈ Ω′ := R \ Ω, (2.7) where f̂(x) = (f̂1(x), f̂2(x)) T , û(ξ) = F [u] = (û1(ξ), û2(ξ)) T , and A(ξ) =  tanh(ξh) ξ − 1 cosh(ξh) 1 cosh(ξh) ξ tanh(ξh)  , p and p′ denote restriction operators to Ω and Ω′ respectively. Denote ~α = (α1, α2) T = (−1, 1)T . It is not difficult to show that A(ξ) ∈ Σα˜o (R). We make the assump- tions f(x) ∈ H−~α/2(Ω) and shall find the solution u(x) = F−1[uˆ](x) in the space H~α/2(R). Theorem 2.6. (Uniqueness) The system (2.7) has at most one solution u ∈ H~α/2o (a, b). Proof. Let u ∈ H~α/2o be a solution of the homoge- neous system of the system (2.7). Using the formu- las (2.4)-(2.6) and Lemma 2.4, we can show that [Au,u] = ∫ ∞ −∞ uˆT(ξ)A(ξ)uˆ(ξ)dξ = 0, from which it follows that u ≡ 0. Denote (Au)(x) = pF−1[A(ξ)uˆ(ξ)](x) (2.8) and rewrite (2.7) in the form A(u)(x) = f(x), x ∈ Ω. (2.9) Our purpose now is to establish an existence of the solution of the system (2.9) in the space H~α/2o (Ω), ~α = (−1, 1)T . Let us introduce the matrices A+(ξ) =  tanh(ξh)ξ 0 0 ξ coth(ξh)  , B(ξ) =  0 −1 cosh(ξh) 1 cosh(ξh) −ξ cosh(ξh). sinh(ξh)  . It is clear that A+(ξ) ∈ Σ~α+, B(ξ) = A(ξ)−A+(ξ) ∈ Σ−~β , ~β = (β1, β2), βj >> 1. Theorem 2.7. (Existence) . If f ∈ H−~α/2(Ω), then the system (2.9) has a unique solution u ∈ H~α/2o (Ω). Số hóa bởi Trung tâm Học liệu – Đại học Thái Nguyên Proof. We represent the operator A defined by the equation (2.8) in the form A = A+ +B, where A+u = pF −1[A+uˆ], Bu = pF−1[Buˆ], uˆ = F [u]. Note that, the system of equations A+u(x) = k(x), u(x) ∈ H~α/2o (Ω) is disintegrated to two distinct equations. These equations were investigated in [4]. Due to [4], the operator A−1+ is bounded from H−~α/2(Ω) into H~α/2o (Ω) and due to of Lemma 2.5, the operator Bu defined by (2.8) is completely continuous from H~α/2o (Ω) into H−~α/2(Ω). In this case, we represent the system (2.9) in the form A+u +Bu = f . Hence, we have u +A−1+ Bu = A −1 + f . (2.10) Since the operator A−1+ B is completely continu- ous, the system (2.10) is Fredholm , and from the uniqueness of the solution it follows that this sys- tem has a unique solution. Therefore, in this case, the system (2.9) has a unique solution u ∈ H~α/2(R). The proof is complete. 3 Reduction to a system of Fredholm integral equations In this section we propose a method for solving the system of dual integral equations (1.6). We intro- duce the following definitions. Definition 3.1. Denote by Cˆmo (a, b) the class of continuous functions u(x) ∈ S′(R), such that u(x) ∈ Cm−1[a, b], u(k)(x) = 0 (k = 0, 1, ...,m − 1), x 6∈ (a, b), u(m)(x) ∈ L2(a, b). Definition 3.2. Let ρ(x) = √ (x− a)(b− x) (a < x < b). We denote by L2ρ±1(a, b) Hilbert spaces of functions with respect to the scalar product and the norm (u, v)Lρ±1 = ∫ b a ρ±1(x)u(x)v(x)dx, ||u||Lρ±1 = √ (u, u)Lρ±1 < +∞. The following lemma holds. Lemma 3.1. Let ϕ ∈ L2ρ(a, b). Denote by ϕ0 the zero-extension of the function ϕ on R. Then, ϕ0 ∈ H−1/2o (a, b). In the spaces L2ρ±1(a, b) we consider the singular integral operator SΩ[ϕ](x) = 1 pii ∫ b a ϕ(t) x− tdt, x ∈ Ω = (a, b), where the integral is taken in the sense of Cauchy principal value. Theorem 3.2. The operator SΩ is bounded in the spaces L2ρ±1(a, b). In the sequel we shall need the following inverse formula for the Cauchy integral. Theorem 3.3. Under the assumption that f(x) ∈ L2ρ(a, b) ∩H1/2(a, b) the integral equation 1 pii ∫ b a ϕ(t) x− tdt = f(x) (3.1) in the L2ρ(a, b) has the solution ϕ(x) = 1 piiρ(x) ∫ b a f(t)ρ(t) x− t dt+ C ρ(x) , (3.2) where C is an arbitrary constant. Now we turn to the system (2.7). We shall find the function u1(x) = F −1[uˆ1](x) and u2(x) = F−1[uˆ2](x) in the form u1(x) = dv1(x) dx , v1(x) ∈ H1/2o (a, b) ∩ L2ρ−1(a, b), (3.3) u2(x) = 1 2 ∫ b a v2(t)sign(x− t)dt, v2 ∈ L2ρ(a, b) ⊂ H−1/2o (a, b) (3.4) where v2 ∈ O1(a, b), i.e.∫ b a v2(x)dx = 0. (3.5) Taking the Fourier transforms of the functions u1, u2 and v1, v2 in virtue of (3.3) and (3.4) we get uˆ1(ξ) = (−iξ)vˆ1(ξ), uˆ2(ξ) = 1 (−iξ) vˆ2(ξ). (3.6) Số hóa bởi Trung tâm Học liệu – Đại học Thái Nguyên Substituting equations (3.6) into (2.7), after some transforms we get the system F−1 [ signξ. tanh(ξh).vˆ1(ξ) + vˆ2(ξ) ξ cosh(ξh) ] (x) = if1(x), x ∈ (a, b), F−1 [ ξ.vˆ1(ξ) cosh(ξh) − signξ. tanh(ξh).vˆ2(ξ) ] (x) = if2(x), x ∈ (a, b). (3.7) Using following formula F−1[sign(ξ).F [v]](x) = 1 pii ∫ b a v(t)dt x− t , we can transform the system (3.7) to the following system of singular integral equations: 1 pii ∫ b a v1(t)dt x− t + ∫ b a v1(t)k11(x− t)dt + ∫ b a v2(t)k12(x− t)dt = if1(x), 1 pii ∫ b a v2(t)dt x− t + ∫ b a v1(t)k21(x− t)dt + ∫ b a v2(t)k22(x− t)dt = −if2(x), v1(x) ∈ L2ρ−1(a, b) ∩H1/2o (a, b), v2 ∈ L2ρ(a, b) ⊂ H−1/2o (a, b), (3.8) where k11(x) = k22(x) = 2i pi ∫ ∞ 0 e−2ξh 1 + e−2ξh sin ξxdξ, (3.9) k12(x) = −i pi ∫ ∞ 0 sin ξx ξ cosh(ξh) dξ, k21(x) = i pi ∫ ∞ 0 ξ sin ξx cosh(ξh) dξ. (3.10) Consider the system of singular integral equations (3.8). Due to the inverse formula (3.2) we have vm(x) + 1 piiρ(x) 2∑ k=1 ∫ b a vk(τ)Lmk(x, τ)dτ = 1 piiρ(x) ∫ b a ρ(t)(−ifm(t)) x− t dt+ Cm ρ(x) , (3.11) where Cm are arbitrary constants and Lmk(x, τ) = ∫ b a ρ(t)kmk(t− τ) x− t dt. For determining the constant Cm we use the con- dition (3.5) and we have Cm = 0(m = 1, 2). Hence, we have the system of Fredholm integral equations ϕm(x) + 2∑ k=1 ∫ b a ϕk(τ)Kmk(x, τ)dτ = hm(x), a < x < b, (m = 1, 2), (3.12) where ϕm(x) = √ ρ(x)vm(x), Kmk(x, τ) = 1 pii Lmk(x, τ)√ ρ(x) √ ρ(τ) , hm(x) = 1 pii √ ρ(x) ∫ b a ρ(t)(−ifm(t)) x− t dt. Thus, we have proved the following theorem. Theorem 3.4. The system of dual integral equa- tions (1.6) with respect to u(x) = F−1[û](x) ∈ H~α/2o (a, b), ~α = (−1, 1)T , is equivalent to the system of Fredholm integral equations (3.12) with respect to ϕm(x) = √ ρ(x)vm(x) ∈ L2(a, b)(m = 1, 2). If fm(x) ∈ L2ρ(a, b)(m = 1, 2), then the system of sin- gular integral equations (3.8) has a unique solution v ∈ (L2ρ(a, b))2. In this case, the solution with re- spect to u(x) = F−1[û](x) ∈ H~α/2o (a, b) of the sys- tem of dual equations (1.6) is given by the formula (3.3) and (3.4). TÝnh gi¶i ®­îc cña mét hÖ ph­¬ng tr×nh cÆp tÝch ph©n trong bµi to¸n biªn hçn hîp cña ph­¬ng tr×nh Laplace ®èi víi miÒn h×nh d¶i Tãm t¾t. Trong bµi b¸o nµy chóng t«i xÐt tÝnh gi¶i ®­îc cña mét hÖ ph­¬ng tr×nh cÆp tÝch ph©n Fourier gÆp trong bµi to¸n biªn hçn hîp cña ph­¬ng tr×nh Laplace ®èi víi miÒn h×nh d¶i. §· chøng minh c¸c ®Þnh lý tån t¹i vµ duy nhÊt nghiÖm cña hÖ trong kh«ng gian Sobolev cña c¸c hµm suy réng. Tr×nh bµy ph­¬ng ph¸p ®­a hÖ ph­¬ng tr×nh cÆp nãi trªn vÒ hÖ ph­¬ng tr×nh tÝch ph©n Fredholm lo¹i hai trong kh«ng gian c¸c hµm b×nh ph­¬ng kh¶ tÝch. Tõ kho¸: BiÕn ®æi Fourier, hÖ ph­¬ng tr×nh cÆp tÝch ph©n, ph­¬ng tr×nh Laplace, bµi to¸n biªn hçn hîp. Số hóa bởi Trung tâm Học liệu – Đại học Thái Nguyên References [1] Ufliand Ia.S., Method of Dual Equations in Problems of Mathematical Physics - Leningrad, Nauka, 1977 (in Russian). [2] Mandal B.N. , Advances in Dual Integral Equa- tions - Chapman & Hall / CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1998. [3] Nguyen Van Ngok and Popov G.Ya, Dual in- tegral equations associated with Fourier trans- forms Ukrainskii matematicheskii Zhurnal.- 1986,-38, N2.- p. 188-195. (in Russian). [4] Nguyen Van Ngoc, On the Solvability of Dual Integral Equations involving Fourier Transform Acta Math. Vietnamica-1988,- 13, N2.- p.21- 30. [5] Nguyen Van Ngoc, Pseudo-differential opera- tors related to orthonormal expansions of gen- eralized functions and application to dual series equations Acta Math. Vietnamica- 2007,- 32, N1, - p. 1-14. [6] Eskin G. I. , Boundary Value Problems for El- liptic Pseudo-Differential Equations - Moscow, Nauka, 1973 (in Russian). [7] Vladimirov V.S., Generalized Functions in Mathematical Physics - Moscow, Mir, 1979 (in Russian). [8] Volevich L.R., Panekh B.P., Some Spaces of Generalized Functions and Imbedding Theo- rems Uspekhii Math. Nauk, 20, N1, 1965(in Russian). [9] Duduchava R., Integral Equations with Fixed Singularites-Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1979. [10] Gahov F. D Boundary-value problems - Moscow, Nauka, 1978 (in Russian). Số hóa bởi Trung tâm Học liệu – Đại học Thái Nguyên

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pdfbrief_33534_37360_109201294535so593_split_20_2047_2048477.pdf