Study of motion sickness incidence in ship motion
Chỉ số gây say sóng MSI là một trong
những vấn đề quan trọng được nghiên cứu
trong chuyển động tàu để đánh giá sự thoải
mái của hành khách trên tàu và trên du
thuyền. Trong bài báo này, chương trình tính
toán MSI sẽ được xây dựng dựa trên các phổ
năng lượng sóng đã được công nhận.
Nghiên cứu không chỉ giúp nhà thiết kế tàu
đánh giá ban đầu về sự thoải mái của hành
khách trong giai đoạn thiết kế , mà còn giúp
ước lượng tốc độ phù hợp để điều khiển tàu
hạn chế say sóng cho hành khách.
8 trang |
Chia sẻ: linhmy2pp | Ngày: 17/03/2022 | Lượt xem: 212 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Study of motion sickness incidence in ship motion, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, Vol 18, No.K7- 2015
Study of motion sickness incidence in
ship motion
Nguyen Anh Tuan 2
Tat-Hien Le 1,2
1 National Key Laboratory of Digital Control and System Engineering (DCSELAB), HCMUT,
VNU-HCM
2 Dept. Naval Architecture & Marine System Engineering, Ho Chi Minh city University of
Technology,VNU-HCM
(Manuscript Received on July 13th, 2015; Manuscript Revised October 16th, 2015)
ABSTRACT
Motion sickness incidence index (MSI) analyzed. Evaluation will not only provide an
is one of essential issues in ship motion initial feedback of passenger’s comfort in
research to access the comfort of passenger ship design stage but also estimate the
on board cruises and yachts. In the paper, suitable speed to steer the cruise
wave energy spectrum and MSI will be comfortably.
Key words: MSI, motion sickness incidence, passenger cruise, wave energy spectrum.
1. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, many prominent yacht builders To comprehend the advantages of ship
research and apply the anti-rolling devices such motion research, one of well-known luxury
as Beneteau, Azimut and Ferretti [1]. The cost of yachts, Azimut Flybridge 54 in figure 1, the roll
anti-rolling device installment contributes 10% motion is reduced up to 80% after installing anti-
of the cost of the luxury yacht like Azimut rolling device. Hence, the comfort of passengers
Flybridge 50 ft [2]. Recently, ship motion has and yacht owners plays the essential role in order
been an essential topic in yacht design [3]. to increase awareness of competition.
Figure 1. Anti-rolling device installed on Azimut Flybridge 53 reduces rolling motion up to 80% [4]
Trang 102
TAÏP CHÍ PHAÙT TRIEÅN KH&CN, TAÄP 18, SOÁ K7- 2015
Figure 2. The proposed process of the comfort assessment
Our research focuses on a comfort of motion Next step, one computes response amplitude
sickness incidence (MSI) of small passenger operators (RAO) by using the uncouple roll
boats and yachts by following ISO 2631/3-1985. motion model and the characteristics of vessel,
In addition, the well-known wave spectrum especially transverse metacentric height and roll
including Bretschneider spectrum and gyradius. After that, the motion response
JONSWAP spectrum are applied to calculate the spectrum will be estimated based on RAO.
characteristics of the motion response spectrum. Final step, motion sickness incidence index
The analysis process of motion sickness is computed according to ISO 2631/3-1985 to
incidence (MSI) calculation will be described evaluate the comfort of passengers on board.
briefly in the figure 2.
2.1. The encounter wave energy spectrum
2. The process of the comfort assessment
Two models of wave energy spectrum such
First step, after collecting the characteristic as Bretschneider spectrum and JONWAPS (Joint
of the wave including the observed circular North Sea Wave Project) spectrum are used.
frequency, the average period and the significant
Bretschneider spectrum use two parameters
wave height, the wave energy spectrum is
that are the characteristic wave height H [m] and
performed. Then, the characteristic of the ship
the average period [s]. Bretschneider wave
operation condition including the ship course
spectrum is suitable for open sea areas with long
direction and velocity of ship are imported to
crest [1]. Bretschneider wave spectrum ( )
calculate and to plot the encounter wave energy
[m2.s] is described as follows:
spectrum.
Trang 103
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, Vol 18, No.K7- 2015
S (ω) = 172.75 ω exp (− ω ) (1) = 0.07 <
= 0.09 >
The JONSWAP spectrum with the
peakedness factor γ = 3.3 in the paper will be 4.849
=
described as follows [2] [1]:
JONSWAP spectrum comprises
( )
Brestchneider spectrum. Figure 3 shows the
691
= 0.658 ∙ 172.75 exp − difference between JONSWAP and
∙ ( ) (2) Bretschneider spectrum, the statistic data in
Aegean Sea are calculated as a case study [3].
where The encounter wave energy spectrum
( ( ) When yacht moves on wave, the angle
( ) =
between yacht direction and wave travel is named
: ℎ encountering angle (Figure 4).
: ℎ
Figure 3. The encounter wave energy spectrum were plotted based on Bretschneider and JONSWAP model
Trang 104
TAÏP CHÍ PHAÙT TRIEÅN KH&CN, TAÄP 18, SOÁ K7- 2015
Figure 4. The encountering angle [1]
The encounter frequency describes as where:
follows [4]: I4: Mass inertia of roll motion, = ,
[kg.m2] ;
= 1 − cos (3)
k : Gyradius of yacht about the x-axis
through the center of gravity CG, [m];
where:
∇: Displacement volume of yacht, [m3];
V: ship speed, [m/s]; ρ: Density of sea water, 1025 kg/m3;
g: gravity acceleration, [m/s2];
A44: Added inertia coefficient of roll
: Wave frequency, [rad/s]; motion,A = 0.3I , [5];
:The encountering angle [deg], beam wave
: Hydrostastic restoring coefficient of
condition at =90 deg, a heading wave condition
roll motion, C = GM ∙ ∇ ∙ ρ ∙ g;
at =180 deg.
GM : Transverse metacenter height, [m].
Using the wave energy spectrum ( ) and
the encounter frequency to calculate the Response amplitude operator (RAO) in the
roll motion describes as the below equation:
encounter wave energy spectrum ( ) [4]:
( ) 1
( ) = (4) RAO = (6)
( )
1 − λ + 4β λ
2.2. Uncoupled roll motion model
The standard model of uncoupled roll where:
motion in regular wave is the second order Tuning factor:
differential equation: [2]
=
(I + A )η̈ + B η̇ + C η
= F ( cosω t
+ i sinω t ) (5)
Trang 105
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, Vol 18, No.K7- 2015
Natural frequency of uncoupled roll motion MSI after 2 hours exposure described as below
[ / ]: expression [5]:
| ̈ |
log −
C [%] = 100 ∙ Φ
= 0.4
I4 + A44
< 10% (10)
2.3. Ship motion response and the criteria of
the comfort of passengers where:
Ship motion is strongly effected by the ̈ : the heave acceleration, ̈ =
encounter wave energy from wave travel and 0.798√m [m/s2];
excitation forces through RAO [4]. The below ( ) :the standard normal cumulative
equation describes the ship motion response of distribution function with zero mean and unity
roll motion [2]: standard deviation.
( ) ( ) (7)
= O’Hanlon and McCauley (1974) suggested
The root mean square (RMS) of the 2nd the factor based on the encounter frequency
order spectral moment of roll motion response fe as the below expression [8]:
spectrum m2 is the root mean square acceleration
v [m/s0.5], [2]:
= 0.654 + 3.697 log
+ 2.32(log ) (11)
= √ =
3. Case study
( )
∫ ∙ ( ) ∙ (8)
( ) The specification of the model of vessel and
ship operation conditions in case study describes
The root mean square (RMS) of the 4th
as follows (Figure 6):
order spectral moment of roll motion response
- Waterline length LWL = 6.9 m;
spectrum m4 is the root mean square acceleration
a [m/s1.5]: [2] - Maximum beam B = 2.1 m;
- Draft T = 0.4 m;
=
- Displacement volume = 2.545 m3;
( )
= ∙ ( ) ∙ (9) -Transverse metacenter height
( )
GMt = 1.453 m;
In 1974, O’Hanlon and McCauley - Gyradius of roll motion kxx = 0.923 m;
represented firstly the concept “Motion sickness
- Damping factor of 0.05 is suggested by
incidence” [6]. Obeying ISO 2631/3-1985, MSI
Lewis (1989) [9]
value has to be smaller than 10% in 2 hours
exposure time [7]. According to Lloyd (1998) - Beam wave condition, = 90
- Operation speed V = 10 knot
Trang 106
TAÏP CHÍ PHAÙT TRIEÅN KH&CN, TAÄP 18, SOÁ K7- 2015
Figure 6. Small passenger ship
Figure 7. Ship motion response is calculated at Sea State 4 in Aegean Sea
(the characteristics wave height 1.88 m and the average period 6.25 s) [3]
Figure 8. Result of MSI [%] in case study
Trang 107
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, Vol 18, No.K7- 2015
Figure 7 indicates that ship motion response 6. CONCLUSIONS
based on JONSWAP model is narrower and In the paper, we offer the progess of
higher than Bretschneider model. Moreover, roll assessment of the comfort based on JONSWAP
motion response of JONSWAP model decreases and Bretschneider models. After calculating
faster than roll motion response of Bretschneider MSI, ship designer or yacht owner can decide to
model. alter the weight distribution including ballast
In 2014, the research of EU-7FP project tank, sewage tank and fuel tank in initial stage or
FAROS conducted by Finland and UK suggests consider anti-rolling device installment. Besides
using the criteria of ISO 2631/3-1985 of 10% to that, captain can consider the suitable velocity to
assess the comfort of passengers in exposure time make passengers on board feel comfortable.
up to 2 hours [7]. In case, MSI exceeds 10%, ship On the other hand, the research also supports
owner should recognize the solution of anti- undergraduate students to comprehend difficult
rolling device installment. subjects including wave energy spectrum ,
After calculating MSI of case study, results response amplitude operation, and MSI in ship
in figure 8 represents the comfort of passenger do motion.
not exceed the criteria of ISO 2631/3-1985 of Acknowledgements: This research is
10% in two cases using Lloyd’s expression supported by National Key Laboratory of
(1998) or using O’Hanlon. In addition, it is said Digital Control and System Engineering
that under 10% of passengers on board does not (DCSELAB), HCMUT, VNU-HCM under grant
suffer any vomit and seasickness. number 281/2014/HD-SKHCN.
Nghiên cứu chỉ số gây say sóng MSI
trong chuyển động tàu
Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 2
Lê Tất Hiển 1,2
1 Phòng thí nghiệm trọng điểm quốc gia về kiểm soát kỹ thuật số và Kỹ thuật Hệ thống
(DCSELAB), HCMUT, ĐHQG-HCM
2 Bộ môn KT Tàu thủy, Khoa KT Giao thông, Trường ĐH Bách khoa, ĐHQG-HCM
TÓM TẮT
Chỉ số gây say sóng MSI là một trong năng lượng sóng đã được công nhận.
những vấn đề quan trọng được nghiên cứu Nghiên cứu không chỉ giúp nhà thiết kế tàu
trong chuyển động tàu để đánh giá sự thoải đánh giá ban đầu về sự thoải mái của hành
mái của hành khách trên tàu và trên du khách trong giai đoạn thiết kế , mà còn giúp
thuyền. Trong bài báo này, chương trình tính ước lượng tốc độ phù hợp để điều khiển tàu
toán MSI sẽ được xây dựng dựa trên các phổ hạn chế say sóng cho hành khách.
Từ khóa: MSI, say sóng, tàu khách, phổ năng lượng sóng
Trang 108
TAÏP CHÍ PHAÙT TRIEÅN KH&CN, TAÄP 18, SOÁ K7- 2015
REFERENCES
[1]. J.M.J. Journée and Jakob Pinkster, International Journal of Mechanical
Introduction in ship hydrodynamics.: Engineering and Application, vol. 3, no.
Delft University of Technology, 2002. Transportation Engineering
Technology, pp. 24-28, 2015.
[2]. Maxsurf Motions Manual.: Bentley
System Inc., 2013. [7]. Seppo Kivimaa et al., "Ship motions,
vibration and noise influence on crew
[3]. J.H. Erikson, "Common Procedures for performance and well-being studies in
Seakeeping in the Ship Design process," FAROS project," in Transport Research
STANAG 4154 2000. Arena, Paris, 2014.
[4]. Rameswar Bhattacharyya, Dynamics of [8]. O'Hanlon J.F. and McCauley M.E.,
Marine Vehicles. USA: John Wiley & "Motion sickness incidence as a
Sons, Inc., 1978. function of the frequency and
acceleration of vertical sinusoidal
[5]. A.R.J.M. Lloyd, Seakeeping: Ship motion," Aerospace Medicine, vol. 45,
behaviour in rough weather.: Ellis pp. 366-369, 1974.
Horwood Limited, 1998.
[9]. E.V. Lewis, Ed., Principles of Naval
[6]. Tuan Anh Nguyen and Hien Tat Le, Architecture.: The Society of Naval
"Study of the effects of roll motion on Architects and Marine Engineers, 1989.
transverse stability of a small boat,"
Trang 109
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- study_of_motion_sickness_incidence_in_ship_motion.pdf